Archive for August, 2008

Pedagogical effectiveness of live online classes

(An older post, here only because of contextual relevance)

The basic pedagogical process can be defined as a systematic transfer of knowledge and - or skills from an instructor to a learner. Depending upon the basic objectives of the process, the transfer may be limited to cognition of facts or may be extended to application and extension of facts, their inter-linkages and derivative concepts.

Since the important players in this interaction are the instructor and the learner, the important determinants of the effectiveness of the process should include the instructor centric parameters, the learner centric parameters and the transaction centric parameters.

Instructor Centric Parameters

Instructor centric parameters revolve around the instructor’s ability to effectively transfer the skills / knowledge and ignite the curiosity and motivation of the learner to explore the area through active thinking and alternative knowledge sources.

  • Level of the target knowledge / skill with the instructor
  • Level of transaction skill of the instructor
  • Ability to engage
  • Ability to motivate
  • Ability to transfer the knowledge / skill
  • Ability to activate the curiosity of the learner
  • Ability to answer related questions
  • Ability to positively handle unrelated queriesMotivation level of the instructor

The level of target knowledge is to a great extent determined by academic achievements of the instructor. To ensure adequate target knowledge, it is important to not only go by the academic qualifications possessed by the instructor but also testing his actual level of knowledge through independent testing.

Transaction skills of the instructor depend upon the awareness of the learning process possessed by the instructor and his aptitude for teaching. A University degree in education provides adequate understanding of the learning process to the instructor. However, it is important to actually test the teaching aptitude of the instructor.

Motivation level of the instructor determines his level of proactive effort in ensuring effective learning. This depends upon the career goals of the instructor, his basic personality and behavioral traits. It is important to ensure that a sound synchrony exists between career objectives and opportunity and progression, the teaching profession provides.

Learner Centric Parameters

Learner centric factors determine the learner’s ability to grasp the target knowledge set in isolation as well as in the context of related concepts. This includes:

  • Level of the pre-requisite knowledge and skills
  • Level of inherent aptitude for the specific knowledge set
  • Level of inquisitiveness
  • Ability to process, analyze and link new information with what already possessed

Together, these factors determine the learning speed.

Several behavioral characteristics of the learner also impact the learning outcome. The ability to concentrate and stay focused, the ability to work in a sustained manner towards a target outcome are major behavioral parameters constituting the “learning personality” of the learner which greatly impacts the learning achieved.

An important distinction between instructor centric and learner centric parameters is that while instructors can be subjected to a selection process to ensure the right ingredients, there can be no such selection process for learners. Anybody with an intent to learn qualifies as a learner and hence, the set of learner comes with an extremely wide spectrum of learner characteristics.

Thus on one hand, we have students with fast learning speeds and extremely conducive learning personalities (“Bright students”) and on the other, we have students with below average learning speeds and obstructive learning personalities.

It is important to note here that there should absolutely be no value judgement attached to the varying levels of learning characteristics of the students. It is absolutely nobody’s case that bright students have more right to learn than the relatively slower ones.

Thus, it becomes imperative for the learning transaction to cater to and compensate for the differences in the individual learning characteristics of students.

Transaction Centric Parameters.

This is the third important set related to the effectiveness of the teacher-taught interaction.

Transaction effectiveness is primarily determined by the ability of the learning process to:

a) cater to and compensate for the wide variation in students’ learning characteristics,
b) facilitate continuous evaluation and feedback from teacher to students,
c) generate positive and negative reactions in response to the positive and negative learning achievements, and,
d) facilitate free communication from student to the teacher regarding query resolution and intimation of any learning help required.

Learning outcome of any learning oriented transaction depends upon the right synergy between the three major kinds of factors impacting the learning process

Traditional Classroom & Online 1-1: Competitors or Collaborators

Traditional classroom setting where a single instructor communicates with a group of students of the roughly the same age, knowledge and skill level has been by far the most popular mechanism of organized instruction. This is in no small measure due to resource effectiveness inherent in the approach.

However, since the learning characteristics of students in a seemingly coherent group vary significantly and classroom instruction inherently being a group learning activity it settles down to cater to the most populous sub-section within a group of students. This means a classroom instruction fundamentally caters to the median of students with learning characteristics lying at the center of the curve. In other words, it catres to the learning speed of an average student thereby leaving the students with learning characteristics at either extremes, stranded.

Thus, while the slow learner may feel confused and puzzled, the fast learner becomes frustrated because teaching is at the speed of an average learner. This has been the most significant drawback of otherwise cost effective and relatively effective classroom instruction.

Personalized online tutoring helps remove this weakness out of the classroom setting by providing supplemental learning at the individual learner’s speed. Thus the slow learner has an option to go slow, imbibing everything at his pace, the fast learner can quickly cover topics and move on thus satisfying and igniting his heightened interest level.

Done in tandem with classroom instruction, proper one-on-on online instruction creates the ideal learning setting for each individual student.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Why so few CEOs with long hair ???

Yes, there are a few of them, Richard Branson and Jonathan Shwartz amongst those well known, but why do long hair find so little favor with business leaders? Is it because the 60’s have conditioned us to associate long hair with rock and roll and hippies or is it because the prospect of maintaining a heavier mane is too time consuming for the jet setting brigade. Is it because long hair denote the recklessness and rebelliousness of a college kid rather than the gravity of a corporate boss responsible for top and bottom-lines and chairing board meetings.

Got a tough business situation - be creative, be innovative. Don’t let the straitjacket of established thought blind you to the newer possibilities. Think out of the box. Yeah, right. But when it comes to how you look, well, look exactly like 10,000 other people do in pinstriped suits swarming the boardrooms, the world over.

Dichotomy, yes. Why? You tell me, and, that’s not the only dichotomy here.

The effect of America on global business is ubiquitous and America is known for the freedom to be yourself. Then why does corporate America or, for that matter, corporate world has so little room for some of its most competent, effective, innovative and yes, powerful inhabitants to be themselves in the context of personal appearance. Or are we trying to suggest that so many of the global business leaders, all strong willed individuals and most of them innovative in their own ways think exactly the same when it comes to their hair length?

The usual refrain is that while you may be ok with it, the guy across the table, be it an investor or a major shareholder or a board member may find you less than reliable/serious if your hair style matches with that of the rock star he saw head-banging last night on tube, screaming his vocal chords out with fingers moving frenziedly over guitar strings. The logic is not without merit. The environment does condition us to think about certain things in certain ways and howsoever rational we are, environmental conditioning does creep in during decision making.

Yes, there is individual freedom but then, there are shareholders, board members and investors who are as human as the rest of us, warts and all. Better safe than sorry!!!

Meanwhile, people like me who lead a business along with maintaining long hair hope that that all important investor did not see a rock concert last night !!!

Share/Save/Bookmark

India’s first ever Olympic gold

Abhinav Bindra won the first ever individual Olympic gold. Oh yes, I missed to suffix the self aggrandizing “for India”, especially, after the magnanimous chest thumping by all and sundry from the Indian sports establishment and plentiful rewards by state governments by dime a dozen. That Abhinav would probably never travel in a train what with a 200 Cr (INR 2 billion) Hotel gift from his dad has no relevance for Lalu who declared a lifetime free pass to him on Indian Railways, and neither does the fact that there could be a lot of sporting talent in the villages of North Bihar which, unfortunately gets used up in ensuring daily survival amidst perennial floods and dilapidated infrastructure.

Union Sports Minister MS Gill grandly congratulated himself and every Indian. Nice thoughts sir. Now, can we also talk about weight lifter Monika Devi who was stopped from boarding the flight to Beijing just hours before citing a failed drug test after which she was cleared. All through the day the athlete kept insisting on TV channels that it was some foul play by some IOA officials who did not want her to go. She was duly cleared of the dope charges but the bus, or rather, the plane had already left. Even if there was no foul play, it does throw a fair amount of light on the state of affairs in Indian sports establishment. Even if it was a mistake, it was one which ruined an athlete’s sporting career - even if it was inadvertent, the accountability should be fixed and the guilty be brought to book. Accountability, now did it not vanish long back along with the dodo?

Abhinav has done all of us proud. The nation of a billion finally got an Olympic gold, individual. It’s a moment of glory which needs to be savored. But the kind of self-congratulation we saw two days back - it is kind of obscene.

In some sense, Abhinav’s success is a lot like the successes of other Indians in several other fields. In almost all the cases, it is the individual who wins, not because of the system but despite it. Be it sports, be it technology, or even education, only those Indians succeed who can fight it through the system. In that sense, every Indian victory is actually an individual victory.

However, it’s not all dark and gloomy. These individual victories will give us the faith that we can win and also the momentum to all ambitious Indians striving out in their chosen fields. Someday, when we have had a critical mass of individual victories, may be, we will set out setting up a system which actively assists the pursuit of victory and not just goes berserk in self-glory whenever some isolated strong willed person imbued with immense talent and loaded with tremendous grit carves out a rare triumph through his own sweat and blood.

Congratulations Abhinav. You did all of us proud.

Share/Save/Bookmark

The best way to prepare for GMAT in India

Actually, the India bit is a tad unnecessary. Test prep for a global test like GMAT has to be the same, Timbuktoo or Tinsukia.

Coming back to the question, what’s the best way to prepare yourself for the desired high score (cliched, I know - no one wants a low score !!!) in GMAT. For that matter, what is the best way to teach yourself anything new be it horse riding, bodybuilding, a new language or even how to write a blog. Simple, go to someone who is an expert and ask him to be your guiding angel for a while.  Imagine learning bicep-building from Arnold or business building from Bill Gates or Larry Page or Richard Branson, imagine learning basketball from Michael Jordan or acting from Al Pacino.

Yes, it’s not going to happen, not at least to the mere mortals unless you happen to be born into one of these families and, then by some strange coincidence, you too take a liking to the same field of endeavor.

Let’s now come back to the relatively less ambitious task of scoring a perfect 800 in GMAT. The best bet would be to catch hold of a guy who is an expert; pray, cajole or somehow convince him to be your guiding angel (try, for instance, making him an offer he can’t refuse !!!) and then follow exactly as he says.

The idea is to seek guidance from an expert who also has the time and inclination to help you understand your own unique combination of skills and attitudes which make you pre-disposed towards a certain score and helps you work on those improvement areas, again unique to you, which can result in the maximum improvement in the score with minimum time and effort investments.

As long as the Perfect Test Prep engine (as discussed in the previous posts) does not attain a high level of maturity, plain old guru-disciple model is the best bet.

Yes, find yourself a personal guru.

If you cannot, do something that approximates the classical guru-disciple dynamics as closely as possible.

Share/Save/Bookmark

The Perfect Test Prep (Part 4)

Let’s do a quick recap - map out the skills/knowledge attributes tested in the ACT/SAT, determine what proficiency levels lead to what scores, determine what interventions are most effective for a given skill gap in a given attribute, determine the student’s target score, determine his current proficiency levels in all the attributes, determine target proficiency levels (derived from target scores), determine the skill gap and finally determine the required interventions.

A caveat, however, is that this process will not be completely analytical and mathematically deterministic. A lot of “understanding” of the the student’s learning style, goals and objectives and personality will come in play and hence the role of “academic thinking” cannot be neglected in the favor of pure analysis.

After the intervention steps are determined and the delivery of the same starts, it is very important to periodically gauge the effectiveness of each of them and the actual improvement that is happening. The findings will help in mid way course correction, if required, as well as help in making the complete mapping process more robust. In a sense, this engine will be a dynamic set of activities which will “learn” from itself as it is applied to more and more students.

Thus, the perfect test prep engine has to be a dynamic combination of cold analysis, warm understanding and an ability of the engine itself to imbibe learnings from its experiences and make itself stronger in terms of determining the right set of interventions which will lead to the desired score improvement with minimum expenditure in terms of time, money and teacher/student effort.

This engine is, as of today, a theoretical concept - but it is doable. the benefits are so immense it justifies investment in such an idea. It is powerful as it combines the best in analytics with the human side of teaching and makes the system self-improving.

Concluded.

Share/Save/Bookmark